🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our kids' innocence". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to enact a law raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a related action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a useful first step," commented the parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "based on strong evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Charities have raised apprehensions. An organization established by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," said a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is largely happening at the state level amid national inaction.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law restricting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some individuals to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies adopt a more measured tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this global conversation evolves, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers globally are increasingly content to delay for platforms to self-regulate.