🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam order, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a revised congressional district plan that may create several five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to lift a lower court's ruling that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in explaining its decision.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely classified voters by their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

In a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's action. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling occurs during a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, for their part, have pushed back with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

Lone Star State AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes supportive of his party. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he stated.

Conversely, opposition party officials decried the outcome. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major Democratic campaign committee.

A leading Democratic leader stated the court had once again eroded its credibility by upholding a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.